Author: Fritz

I have said it before, and I will keep saying it until I am convinced people are listening. AI detectors can be good and bad at the same time. Particularly in education.

I am completely onboard with teachers using these tools. They need help figuring out whether their lessons are going anywhere, and whether people are actually doing the work to improve their skills, rather than outsourcing anything tough to an LLM.

Trusting an AI detector a little too much, however, can be extremely damaging. Punish a student just because an AI detector gave them an 82% AI score, when you do not know exactly where that score comes from, and you are putting their whole future in jeopardy.

So when I am looking at AI detectors that work with something like Canvas, one of the more popular educational platforms used by schools, I am always going to be a bit more cautious.

Continue reading “Best AI Detectors for Canvas: Tools You Can Trust Near a Student’s Record”

The short answer: GPTZero is the safer, more defensible ai detector for high-stakes use, and ZeroGPT is the cheaper, faster option for casual quick-checks. The winner flips depending on what you feed it. ZeroGPT catches raw, unedited AI blog text better.

GPTZero is far safer at not falsely accusing a real human writer, posting a 3.3% false-positive rate against ZeroGPT’s 50% on formal human text. Which one you should use comes down to your content type and how much a wrong answer costs you.

First, clear up the confusion that sends most people here: GPTZero and ZeroGPT are not the same product, and not the same company. They are two unrelated tools with near-identical names.

GPTZero was built by Princeton undergrad Edward Tian and co-founder Alex Cui; ZeroGPT, run by CEO Rawad Baroud, launched roughly 15 days later and rode the wave of GPTZero’s viral press.

Continue reading “GPTZero vs ZeroGPT: Which One Can You Actually Trust?”

I’ll start by saying I’m very against the idea of any HR or recruitment team using AI too much, even if I’m starting to look like the minority on that front. I know AI can make the whole hiring process a lot faster, but no company should trust a bot to make staffing decisions on its behalf.

That also applies to basing your entire judgement of a person around whether or not they ended up with a high “AI-generated score” when you put their work assignment, resume/CV or cover letter through an AI detection platform.

You definitely need to know if an AI tool is fabricating details about a candidate, or doing all the work you’re supposed to be evaluating them on in the background, but you need to be cautious too. Act too accusatory, and you could end up driving perfectly good talent away.

Continue reading “Best AI Detector for Recruiters: 4 Tools You Can Trust When You’re Growing Your Team”